Currently, autowidth only calculate width by no. of characters.
I recall @jgm does something smart in pandoc to account for the width of unicode character. e.g. Chinese character is considered twice as long as an ASCII.
Considerations:
what if its other unicode character?
do we need to match pandoc's behavior exactly? Note that this should not affect idempotency (because once the numerical value of width are set, it's done).
Currently, autowidth only calculate width by no. of characters.
I recall
@jgm
does something smart in pandoc to account for the width of unicode character. e.g. Chinese character is considered twice as long as an ASCII.Considerations: