fix: Cleanup reply and callRequest after fetching

[AntonAndell]

Description:

Commit Message

type: commit message

see the guidelines for commit messages.

Changelog Entry

version: <log entry>

Checklist:

• [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [ ] I have documented my code in accordance with the documentation guidelines
• [ ] My changes generate no new warnings
• [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• [ ] I have run the unit tests
• [ ] I only have one commit (if not, squash them into one commit).
• [ ] I have a descriptive commit message that adheres to the commit message guidelines

Please review the CONTRIBUTING.md file for detailed contributing guidelines.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 63.51%. Comparing base (617016e) to head (5b00ea3). Report is 1 commits behind head on bugfix/xcall-java-empty-response-decoding.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## bugfix/xcall-java-empty-response-decoding #293 +/- ## =============================================================================== - Coverage 63.68% 63.51% -0.18% Complexity 75 75 =============================================================================== Files 42 42 Lines 2652 2645 -7 Branches 37 36 -1 =============================================================================== - Hits 1689 1680 -9 - Misses 946 948 +2 Partials 17 17 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [rust](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project) | `61.79% <100.00%> (-0.23%)` | :arrow_down: | | [solidity](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project) | `59.20% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [contracts/cosmwasm-vm/cw-xcall/src/execute\_call.rs](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=contracts%2Fcosmwasm-vm%2Fcw-xcall%2Fsrc%2Fexecute_call.rs&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project#diff-Y29udHJhY3RzL2Nvc213YXNtLXZtL2N3LXhjYWxsL3NyYy9leGVjdXRlX2NhbGwucnM=) | `81.05% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [...in/java/foundation/icon/xcall/CallServiceImpl.java](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=contracts%2Fjavascore%2Fxcall%2Fsrc%2Fmain%2Fjava%2Ffoundation%2Ficon%2Fxcall%2FCallServiceImpl.java&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project#diff-Y29udHJhY3RzL2phdmFzY29yZS94Y2FsbC9zcmMvbWFpbi9qYXZhL2ZvdW5kYXRpb24vaWNvbi94Y2FsbC9DYWxsU2VydmljZUltcGwuamF2YQ==) | `84.49% <ø> (-0.06%)` | :arrow_down: | ... and [7 files with indirect coverage changes](https://app.codecov.io/gh/icon-project/xcall-multi/pull/293/indirect-changes?src=pr&el=tree-more&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=icon-project)