search

icra / ecam

Energy performance and Carbon emissions Assessment and Monitoring tool (Lluís Bosch, Lluís Corominas, IWA, Wacclim project, GIZ)
http://wacclim.org/ecam
Other
12 stars 17 forks source link

Upate GHG summary #71

Closed Ranf16 closed 6 years ago

Ranf16 commented 6 years ago

Please see the video: https://www.dropbox.com/s/zpwjmp92riujjf1/GHG%20summary.mp4?dl=0

Summary of the video:

  1. Please rearange the table so that it looks like below: image

  2. If the substages of a stage are activated, the value of GHG emissions from the substages should be also used to calculate the total of the system and the overal total.

  3. Remove the "(from untreated wastewater...)" and integrate those emissions in the collection stage again. To do so you'll need to have resident population also as an input at stage and substage level.

In addition (not in the video):

  1. The unit "Kg CO2 eq" should be renamed to "Kg CO2 eq / assessment period" image
holalluis commented 6 years ago

Hi Ranjin, thank you for the video, it is very helpful.

I agree on the proposed change for number 1, indeed it is a better design.

For number 2, I'm not sure, because which number should you get when you have mixed options (i.e. some stages with checkbox active and some without)

For number 3 is not as easy to fix, because the untreated wastewater cannot be calculated at substage level, because you need "collected population" minus "serviced population", and serviced population is something characteristic of ww treatment, it is difficult to think about it as a characteristic of collection, unless we come up with a way of connecting collection substages with treatment substages. In this case, we can take the serviced population from the treatment substages connected to the collection substage.

I agree on number 4.

Thanks,

Ranf16 commented 6 years ago

Regarding No. 2: It should use always only the selected option. That means for the stages with activated checkboxes it should use the substage value and for the stages where the checkbox is not activated it should use the stage value. Thereby the user can decide what he sees.

Regarding No. 3. OK. I understand. But then it should look visually nicer than it is now. i.e. at least the same type of read as the background color.

This means that for the total of the wastewater system, the value of untreated wastewater is added to the stages and / or substages depending on the selection of the checkboxes