Closed Lawproto closed 1 year ago
Thanks @Lawproto. Can you perform an import test with @Fabrizio69 ?
cc @icub-tech-iit/silo-mech
@fiorisi I am available to do so. I suggest I create a fake assembly with the cable, do the BOM import in WinGST, verify quantity needed there and then proceed to delete the assembly.
@Fabrizio69 is this ok for you?
@fiorisi I did a test with an assembly, containing two cable cuts which are using the Ø0.81 Carlstahl steel cable.
This is the BOM output by Creo:
This is the result in WinGST after importing:
It seems pretty good to me!
Very good @Lawproto! I approve the PR, let's only wait a positive feedback also from @Fabrizio69 before merging it.
Hi @Lawproto and @fiorisi, here is my positive feedback. Maybe I would dedicate a category just for tendons (instead of REWK). I removed the codes used for test (cod.16956, 16957, 16958 and the BOMs with these codes).
@Fabrizio69 I would use the same category for the tendon sheaths and other possible future length based cuts. Let us choose wisely.
QUANT = quantistic FUZZ = fuzzy IRR = irrational
m2c
Preparing to deal with stuff-by-length in Creo.