Closed MrAndrea closed 4 years ago
A first proposal suggested by Ferrari is the EnviteC OOM109. Here is the datasheet.
EnviteC, by Honeywell, has this catalog: Envitec High Quality O2 Gas Sensors.pdf
Envitec distributor in Italy:
A.M.S. s.r.l. Via A. Degasperi 34/3 38123 Trento Italy Medical Products telephone: +39 0 461 925715 fax: +39 0 461 923500 email:info[at]amstrento.it web:www.amstrento.it
Comedical s.a.s. Via della Cooperazione, 29 38123 Mattarello (TN) Italy Breath Alcohol Measuring telephone: +39 0 461 925715 fax: +39 0 461 923500 email:info[at]comedical.biz web:www.comedical.biz
Feature requested:
considerate che a livello di installazione è necessario utilizzare sensori tipo l’oom109 o oom102 che hanno il codolo filettato alla base. Un sensore come l’oom101 ad esempio sarebbe un problema.
Another useful feature seems the response time, probably faster is better for us: the OOM109
has a response time <360ms. The other sensors has slower response time, <5s or <12s, and probably they are useless for our application.
I contacted Envitec Italian distributors and asked for availability and quotation for OOM109
and OOM103
.
@simeonedussoni do you have any comment on these sensors?
@MrAndrea they seem to be adequate. probably even a 5 s response time is not critical provided we have a fast feedback in the form of an audible alarm to correct as soon as possible the situation, we can consider that at worst the patient will breathe air which has 21% oxygen. I would avoid 12 s response time anyway.
This issue to investigate suitable oxygen sensors for the ventilator.