Closed Nicogene closed 8 months ago
Regarding the new name of the repo, I was thinking about something like xcub_moveit2
or xcub_ros2
. Since it contains the configuration files for both iCub and ergoCub, I think that xcub could be a solution to avoid using a long name like icub_ergocub_moveit2
. Moreover, I saw that the convention with this kind of project is to use the _ros2
suffix even if they contain also MoveIt2-dependent packages. I don't have a strong opinion about the two, what do you think is the best?
cc @pattacini @Nicogene @traversaro
I like xcub
👍🏻
I would go for _moveit2
as that's our main contribution. Maybe people rely on _ros2
even with the presence of MoveIt2 packages since those are needed for other goals.
Could this be the case? If not, I'm fine with _ros2
too.
Can we use - instead of _ for consistency with the rest of repo in the organization?
No prob, we go with xcub-moveit2
then?
Ok!
Name just changed!
Thanks @pattacini!
Repository made public too.
@martinaxgloria please review the content in order to replace the old name with the new name.
Hi @traversaro, as per https://github.com/icub-tech-iit/tickets/issues/218, the last step to accomplish this task is to publish the iCub/ergoCub support on the MoveIt website. Are you in contact with some maintainers to understand how to proceed?
cc @Nicogene @pattacini
Hi @traversaro, as per icub-tech-iit/tickets#218, the last step to accomplish this task is to publish the iCub/ergoCub support on the MoveIt website. Are you in contact with some maintainers to understand how to proceed?
In https://moveit.ros.org/robots/ they mentioned to either contact picknik or post on discourse. To understand more, I asked on MoveIt's Discord: https://discordapp.com/channels/717058325480734830/717148778238574623/1185146323687710791 . I will ping relevant persons if we do not get an answer. In the meanwhile, I would prepare a cool photo to replace the really old one in the moveit website.
Hi @traversaro, as per icub-tech-iit/tickets#218, the last step to accomplish this task is to publish the iCub/ergoCub support on the MoveIt website. Are you in contact with some maintainers to understand how to proceed?
In moveit.ros.org/robots they mentioned to either contact picknik or post on discourse. To understand more, I asked on MoveIt's Discord: discordapp.com/channels/717058325480734830/717148778238574623/1185146323687710791 . I will ping relevant persons if we do not get an answer. In the meanwhile, I would prepare a cool photo to replace the really old one in the moveit website.
We should add both iCub and ergoCub to the website, for the right photo to put we may ask @maggia80
Hi @traversaro, as per icub-tech-iit/tickets#218, the last step to accomplish this task is to publish the iCub/ergoCub support on the MoveIt website. Are you in contact with some maintainers to understand how to proceed?
In https://moveit.ros.org/robots/ they mentioned to either contact picknik or post on discourse. To understand more, I asked on MoveIt's Discord: https://discordapp.com/channels/717058325480734830/717148778238574623/1185146323687710791 . I will ping relevant persons if we do not get an answer. In the meanwhile, I would prepare a cool photo to replace the really old one in the moveit website.
On MoveIt's discord @sea-bass kindly pointed out that we can just open a PR against this repo: https://github.com/ros-planning/moveit.ros.org/blob/789f50461b68b332b02695e3cb2976db3df0b5c7/robots/index.markdown?plain=1#L1594-L1603 , so probably we can just open a PR on that repo.
Ok, thank you @traversaro! I'll open a PR.
PR opened here:
cc @Nicogene @pattacini @maggia80 @traversaro
PR merged. Now, you can find iCub and ergoCub within robots page on MoveIt website! :rocket:
cc @Nicogene @pattacini @maggia80 @traversaro
Superb! 🏆
Awesome!
We want to make this repository public and announce its existence on our main channels.