Ramp rates

[PaulTalbot-INL]

---

Pull Request Description

What issue does this change request address?

Closes #88, and contains all of PR #284

What are the significant changes in functionality due to this change request?

Adds ramp rate limiters to produces components (not demands or stores).

---

For Change Control Board: Change Request Review

The following review must be completed by an authorized member of the Change Control Board.

• [x] 1. Review all computer code.
• [x] 2. If any changes occur to the input syntax, there must be an accompanying change to the user manual and xsd schema. If the input syntax change deprecates existing input files, a conversion script needs to be added (see Conversion Scripts).
• [x] 3. Make sure the Python code and commenting standards are respected (camelBack, etc.) - See on the wiki for details.
• [x] 4. Automated Tests should pass.
• [x] 5. If significant functionality is added, there must be tests added to check this. Tests should cover all possible options. Multiple short tests are preferred over one large tes.
• [x] 6. If the change modifies or adds a requirement or a requirement based test case, the Change Control Board's Chair or designee also needs to approve the change. The requirements and the requirements test shall be in sync.
• [x] 7. The merge request must reference an issue. If the issue is closed, the issue close checklist shall be done.
• [x] 8. If an analytic test is changed/added, the the analytic documentation must be updated/added.
• [x] 9. If any test used as a basis for documentation examples have been changed, the associated documentation must be reviewed and assured the text matches the example.

[moosebuild]

Job CentOS 8 on f19ca74 : invalidated by @dylanjm

Changes made to dependencies

[PaulTalbot-INL]

I did not see this locally before, looking at it more carefully ...

[PaulTalbot-INL]

hm, not sure why this is failing and not getting enough info from the tester to see what it's failing on. I'll have to try and find a windows machine to test on.

[PaulTalbot-INL]

Well, @dylanjm, relative tolerance didn't work before, but seems to work in conjunction with ordered CSV. Good enough for me if it's good enough for you.