JOSS PorousFlow paper amendments

WilkAndy commented 4 years ago

Reason

@cpgr, reviewers (= @hsheldon) have suggested the following changes:

Include the reference: Sheldon, H.A., P.M. Schaubs, Teagan N. Blaikie, Marcus Kunzmann, S. Schmid, and S Spinks. 2019. "An Integrated Study of the McArthur River Mineral System: From Geochemistry, Geophysics and Sequence Stratigraphy to Basin-Scale Models of Fluid Flow." In Annual Geoscience Exploration Seminar (AGES) Proceedings, 81-86. Darwin: Northern Territory Geological Survey
Include the reference: Sheldon, H A, and P M Schaubs. 2017. "Predicting the Location of Unconformity-Related Uranium Deposits Using Numerical Simulations on a Supercomputer" In 18th International Association for Mathematical Geosciences Conference 2017, 54. Fremantle: IAMG. @hsheldon , is this correct? I can't find it online.
Remove the reference to [@heather] (in favour of the above 2)
Perhaps mention other applications where PorousFlow is useful, for instance industrial processes.
Specify how PorousFlow is different from OpenGeoSys, PFLOTRAN and OPM. (Andy thinks this might be difficult in just a few words, and we don't want to denigrate these excellent codes.)

Design

Change modules/porous_flow/paper.md and modules/porous_flow/paper.bib . Probably do this after #14796 is done.

Impact

Better documentation

WilkAndy commented 4 years ago

Also, add this reference, which involves geothermal work:

Jin, W. and Podgorney, R. and McLing, T. "THM coupled numerical analysis on the geothermal energy storage and extraction in porous fractured reservoir". In 54th US Rock Mechanics Symposium, Golden, Colarado, USA, 28 June-1 July 2020, ARMA 20-1338. 1--10.

WilkAndy commented 4 years ago

Hi @cpgr , I've included the above references. What's your opinion on @hsheldon 's other comments:

Perhaps mention other applications where PorousFlow is useful, for instance industrial processes.
Specify how PorousFlow is different from OpenGeoSys, PFLOTRAN and OPM. (Andy thinks this might be difficult in just a few words, and we don't want to denigrate these excellent codes.)

cpgr commented 4 years ago

They are both good points, but I think the paper is already near the word limit isn't it? It might be hard to do both?

WilkAndy commented 4 years ago

True about the word limit

WilkAndy commented 4 years ago

@cpgr just told me that Permann paper is now published - see #14851

WilkAndy commented 3 years ago

Closed by the above commit

idaholab / moose