Open ngrilli opened 7 years ago
Why wasn't this model pushed? It looks like a very important contribution!
Dear @MartimSalgado
The code for the heat source given by damage propagation is available in this repository: https://github.com/ngrilli/Marisol
It is documented in the following paper: https://aip.scitation.org/doi/abs/10.1063/1.5030656
Best Regards, Nicolò Grilli
Description of the enhancement or error report
We currently have the phase field damage model implemented in the Kernel SplitPFFractureBulkRate and in the Material LinearIsoElasticPFDamage. However, when the phase field damage model is coupled with temperature (HeatConductionTimeDerivative and HeatConduction), it is necessary to add the heat source given by the dissipation due to crack propagation (damage growth) in order to be thermodynamically consistent. This heat source is given by: Q = - (dPsi / dc) (dc / dt), where c is the damage phase field and Psi is the free energy: Psi = (1 - c)^2 G0_pos + G0_neg, where G0_pos and G0_neg are the positive and negative components of the specific strain energies.
C. Miehe, L.M. Schänzel, H. Ulmer, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 294 (2015) 449–485 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045782514004423
P. Chakraborty, Y. Zhang, M.R. Tonks, Multi-scale modeling of microstructure dependent inter-granular fracture in UO2 using a phase-field based method Idaho National Laboratory technical report https://inldigitallibrary.inl.gov/sites/sti/sti/6360441.pdf
Rationale for the enhancement or information for reproducing the error
Necessity of a heat source for the dissipation due to crack propagation/damage growth to be thermodynamically consistent
Identified impact
Add another Kernel CrackPropagationHeatEnergy and another Material ComputeCrackPropagationHeatEnergy (similar to what was done for the energy dissipation due to plastic deformation)