Closed danott closed 10 years ago
+1 NEED.
I think this is essential and I use the syntax-highlighted block code for many things. If I were to use gist.io I would probably miss this feature.
I use Gists extensively (usually private Gists to teammates) to illustrate snippets of code that aren't "worth" pushing a "breadcrumb" to the repo. This problem is why I can't use gist.io for my main Gist use case.
+1
HTML Pipeline is what is used, if anyone wants to get started on a fork. I would, but don't have the time in the immediate future.
@danott Link text correct, but the actual link leads somewhere else; here's a link to the repo.
@jdickey yep, definitely did my markdown link backwards. Fixed now
+1 code blocks are not rendered: http://gist.io/5955726
Fixed in: 0252440950b633a298932fa4ba33480ecea3a9c7
Example: http://gist.io/6225505
Oh, that was easier than I expected.
Edit: After testing with a language set it seems that gist.io is missing CSS definitions for the syntax highlighting. Would it be possible to include these?
Example: http://gist.io/6227075 (inspect HTML)
@idan :100: YEAH!
GitHub Flavored Markdown allows blocks of code to be marked up with a triple back tick opening and closing the block. Gist.io currently does not appear to support this.
Example: GitHub Gist → Gist.io Gist