Open GoogleCodeExporter opened 9 years ago
I think I fixed this. Try again and let me know. Thanks
Sam
Original comment by shobe...@gmail.com
on 14 Sep 2011 at 12:39
Perfect, the velvet SE run went perfect already finished and with reasonable
output data! Put it in the server library.
The Velvet PE is running from 5 days..do you think that also this module needs
some fix? I am attaching it just to check what do you think.
Fed
Original comment by federica...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 6:15
Attachments:
Yeah, 5 days is too long. I'll take a look.
Original comment by shobe...@gmail.com
on 15 Sep 2011 at 6:21
Just to follow up...after Bernard has rebooted the system over the week end I
ran it again (the VELVET PE) but it is running since days...I really think
there is something weird with that given the rapidity of the assembly with the
single end data.
Fed
Original comment by federica...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2011 at 6:49
That is very strange. I just ran the PE on fgene1 and it completed in a few
seconds so I'm not sure what the problem is. Which module is it stuck on for
you? Also just a minor change - you can get rid of the "test.config" part of
the data sink path because the module creates its own directory inside of
/projects1/test_pipeline/NEW_ORGANIZATION/de_novo_assembly/VELVET_PE.
Original comment by shobe...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2011 at 8:15
Actually it worked on fgene3...on fgene1 the velvetg module was stuck...I am
using this one: are you saying that I ahve to remove the path in the output tab
in the output data sink?
Fed
Original comment by federica...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2011 at 9:13
Attachments:
You don't have to, but yes, if you get rid of just the last part of the path,
the module will create an output directory in VELVET_PE instead of in
VELVET_PE/test.config/ ("test.config" in this case is a directory).
Original comment by shobe...@gmail.com
on 19 Sep 2011 at 9:18
I ran the workflow you attached on fgene1 and it worked. Is it still causing
you problems?
Original comment by shobe...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 12:31
No, now is ok. Thanks!
Fed
Original comment by federica...@gmail.com
on 20 Sep 2011 at 12:43
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
federica...@gmail.com
on 13 Sep 2011 at 4:11Attachments: