How best to include DOIs/PIDs to publications derived from a dataset

[ssilcot]

These publications were derived from research using the KHRD database:

• DOI (just a short note; includes a statement it's under permanent embargo: McCalman, J., Smith, L., Silcot, S., & Kippen, R. (2018). Koori health research database. figshare, https://doi.org/10.4225/03/5a9779c80f529
• DOI substantive research work arising from and good description of the provenance of the database: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-020-09253-x as listed in "Minerva" (Unimelb's research publications repo, here: https://minerva-elements.unimelb.edu.au/viewobject.html?cid=1&id=1517000)

SS to confirm it is appropriate to add this to the catalog entry as per DCAT2 spec (https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/#examples-dataset-publication):

dct:isReferencedBy <https://doi.org/10.4225/03/5a9779c80f529>; dct:isReferencedBy <http://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-020-09253-x>;

Check that CatPrez will appropriately render this relationship (does not need to resolve/fetch anything).

[nicholascar]

In general we wouldn't expect to capture outbound references from catalogues items to things derived from them, but the other way around. So, using dct:reference as the inverse of dct:isReferencedBy, catalogue entries for the publications could include:

<https://doi.org/10.4225/03/5a9779c80f529> dct:references <https://data.idnau.org/pid/KHRD> .
<http://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-020-09253-x> dct:references <https://data.idnau.org/pid/KHRD> .

So we would only store this info if we were recording the publications in a catalogue somewhere.