Closed Bodigrim closed 4 years ago
I don't think stack/no-stack is a binary decision. All we need is one build in a travis matrix that uploads it to coveralls. I think it is a very nice feature to have and it doesn't come at a cost. All we need is this:
- env: BUILD=stack ARGS="--resolver lts-14.27" STACK_YAML="--stack-yaml stack-old.yaml" COVERALLS_STACK_YAML="stack-coveralls.yaml"
compiler: ": #stack 8.6.5"
addons: {apt: {packages: [libgmp-dev]}}
And a conditional in bash. This way we not only get coverage reports, but also validate building with stack.
@Bodigrim thank you for setting it up.
Force-pushed, I've restored coverage reporting.
I tried haskell-ci --doctest
, but it does not seem to work without custom setup.
https://github.com/Bodigrim/random/tree/haskell-ci-doctest
@phadej could you possibly advise?
@Bodigrim Oleg mentioned that splitmix is setup in such a ways that it can run doctests without custom setup. Can't really suggest any more than that, maybe @phadej will shed some light for us.
OK, I managed to work around it. Not in the most elegant way, but it works without custom Setup.hs
:
$ if [ $HCNUMVER -ge 80000 ] ; then (cd ${PKGDIR_random} && doctest src) ; fi
Examples: 100 Tried: 100 Errors: 0 Failures: 0
The command "if [ $HCNUMVER -ge 80000 ] ; then (cd ${PKGDIR_random} && doctest src) ; fi" exited with 0.
As discussed in https://github.com/haskell/random/pull/62 and elsewhere.
I had to sacrifice coverage shield, mostly because of
hpc-coveralls
being abandoned, but hopefully this is acceptable.