(At least) I use some pieces in Data.Fin.Extra half times I use Data.Fin. Some other parts are tricky or have complicated dependencies. I propose to move some (I think) most useful parts of Data.Fin.Extra to base, splitting it to different modules to not to make clutter of Data.Fin namespace and module.
Also, I realised that one function that has been in Data.Fin.Extra for a very long time now is implemented in Data.Fin with a different name, so I suggest to deprecate definition in Data.Fin.Extra in favour of definition from base.
Also, I moved one division-related function that was in Data.Fin.Extra and left there near the other division-related functions.
For backwards compatibility, I added re-exports of newly added base modules into Data.Fin.Extra.
Should this change go in the CHANGELOG?
[x] If this is a fix, user-facing change, a compiler change, or a new paper
implementation, I have updated CHANGELOG_NEXT.md (and potentially also
CONTRIBUTORS.md).
Description
(At least) I use some pieces in
Data.Fin.Extrahalf times I useData.Fin. Some other parts are tricky or have complicated dependencies. I propose to move some (I think) most useful parts ofData.Fin.Extratobase, splitting it to different modules to not to make clutter ofData.Finnamespace and module.Also, I realised that one function that has been in
Data.Fin.Extrafor a very long time now is implemented inData.Finwith a different name, so I suggest to deprecate definition inData.Fin.Extrain favour of definition frombase.Also, I moved one division-related function that was in
Data.Fin.Extraand left there near the other division-related functions.For backwards compatibility, I added re-exports of newly added
basemodules intoData.Fin.Extra.Should this change go in the CHANGELOG?
CHANGELOG_NEXT.md(and potentially alsoCONTRIBUTORS.md).