idyll-lang / idyll

Create explorable explanations and interactive essays.
http://idyll-lang.org/
MIT License
2.01k stars 87 forks source link

couldn`t convert string f \mathbin⨾ g \in \operatorname{hom}(A, C) #683

Open suhr opened 3 years ago

suhr commented 3 years ago

Describe the bug

Idyll fails to render math formulae with symbol.

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. [Equation]f \mathbin⨾ g \in \operatorname{hom}(A, C)[/Equation]

Expected behavior

Idyll should show the formula correctly.

Desktop:

Additional context

KaTeX actually shows this correctly: https://katex.org/?data=%7B%22displayMode%22%3Atrue%2C%22leqno%22%3Afalse%2C%22fleqn%22%3Afalse%2C%22throwOnError%22%3Atrue%2C%22errorColor%22%3A%22%23cc0000%22%2C%22strict%22%3A%22warn%22%2C%22output%22%3A%22htmlAndMathml%22%2C%22trust%22%3Afalse%2C%22macros%22%3A%7B%22%5C%5Cf%22%3A%22%231f(%232)%22%7D%2C%22code%22%3A%22f%20%5C%5Cmathbin%E2%A8%BE%20g%20%5C%5Cin%20%5C%5Coperatorname%7Bhom%7D(A%2C%20C)%22%7D. But it warns on a non-standard symbol, so if you enable strict mode, it throws an error. It seems like Idyll is overly strict on math, and there seems to be no option to make it less strict.

mathisonian commented 3 years ago

Will keep this open because it should parse, but does [Equation latex:"f \mathbin⨾ g \in \operatorname{hom}(A, C)" /] work as a workaround?

suhr commented 3 years ago

No, unfortunately.

mathisonian commented 3 years ago

Got it - thanks for reporting @suhr. That leads me to suspect the bug is coming from the compiler rather than the [Equation] component. I'll dig into it and report back what i find