Closed italobusi closed 2 years ago
https://github.com/haomianzheng/IETF-ACTN-YANG-Model/issues/20#issuecomment-577491209
According to the discussion so far, it is proposed to use option A in the layer1-types. Meanwhile another parameters indicating the multiplexing would be added on the client-signal model. The new parameter is going to be re-confirmed when updating the client-signal YANG.
Issue close for Ethernet services
A new issue #12 has been submitted for the AMP versus BMP mapping:
https://github.com/haomianzheng/IETF-ACTN-YANG-Model/issues/20#issuecomment-477714315
To be discussed:
So we specify the GFP-F and the GMP multiplexing in the same identity or via different identities in otn-types.yang?
Option A: identity ETH-1Gb { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE"; }
Option B: identity ETH-1Gb-GFPF { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE with GFP-F"; }
identity ETH-1Gb-GMP { base client-signal; description "Client signal type of 1GbE with GMP"; }
Imported from https://github.com/haomianzheng/IETF-ACTN-YANG-Model/issues/20