I read the ietf-microwave-topology and I wonder why the actual-received-level power is absent : If the NMS have the SNIR it probably also known the received power. I believe that you discussed that and I am not sure if an "issue" is an appropriate section for such question.
+--:(microwave-carrier)
+--rw microwave-carrier!
+--rw tx-frequency? uint32
+--rw rx-frequency? uint32
+--rw channel-separation? uint32
+--ro actual-tx-cm? identityref
+--ro actual-snir? decimal64
+--ro actual-transmitted-level? decimal64
+--ro actual-received-level? decimal64 /* This line does not exist. */
In addition, I see that the module ietf-microwave-radio-link use a type power whereas ietf-microwave-topology directly uses type decimal64 for power levels.
This was miss-categorized on Issue 23 of draft-ybam-rfc8561bis on November 2023 and "Wait for mw-topo to publish, then work on a bis."
I read the ietf-microwave-topology and I wonder why the
actual-received-level
power is absent : If the NMS have the SNIR it probably also known the received power. I believe that you discussed that and I am not sure if an "issue" is an appropriate section for such question.In addition, I see that the module ietf-microwave-radio-link use a type
power
whereas ietf-microwave-topology directly uses typedecimal64
for power levels.This was miss-categorized on Issue 23 of draft-ybam-rfc8561bis on November 2023 and "Wait for mw-topo to publish, then work on a bis."