search

ietf-ccamp-wg / ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-ext-RFC9093-bis

CCAMP WG repository for ietf-layer0-types-ext
3 stars 3 forks source link

Need for term-type identities #14

Closed italobusi closed 3 years ago

italobusi commented 3 years ago

The following identities were defined in layer0-types and removed from layer0-types during WG LC with the intention to further develop their definitions in the layer0-types-ext:

  identity term-type {
    description
      "Termination type";
    reference
      "ITU-T G.709: Interfaces for the Optical Transport Network";
  }

  identity term-phys {
    base term-type;
    description
      "Physical layer termination";
  }

  identity term-otu {
    base term-type;
    description
      "OTU (Optical Transport Unit) termination";
  }

  identity term-odu {
    base term-type;
    description
      "ODU (Optical Data Unit) termination";
  }

  identity term-opu {
    base term-type;
    description
      "OPU (Optical Payload Unit) termination";
  }

Are these identities needed? Where? How?

May depend on the model used to setup connectivity services over a DWDM network

Co-authored-by: sergiobelotti sergio.belotti@nokia.com

italobusi commented 3 years ago

Used by the l0-tunnel-attributes grouping proposed in PR #17