Closed ggalimba56 closed 2 years ago
egriseri
commented
2 years ago @ggalimba56 for sure we can't fully cover all the modulation formats. I also noticed that we included dual carrier format, and this opens to additional complexity (let's imagine a 4 carrier format, and so on) Anyway, for the probabilistic shaping we can specify the "base" format as 8QAM, 16QAM, 32QAM, 64QAM but I really doubt we should specify the entropy value. What do you think?
sergiobelotti
commented
2 years ago Call on 05/24/22: The proposal from Gabriel is to add the first 4 modulation formats listed above and leave a part the last two for the moment. AP @ggalimba56 Gabriele: to introduce description on the 4 modulation format above and a standard reference (if exists)
ggalimba56
commented
2 years ago Here a possible proposal:
identity DPSK { base modulation; description “DPSK (Differential Phase Shift Keying) modulation"; }
identity QAM32 { base modulation; description "QAM32 (32 symbols Quadrature Amplitude Modulation)"; }
identity DP-QAM32 { base modulation; description "DP-QAM32 (32 symbols Dual Polarization Quadrature Amplitude Modulation)"; }
identity QAM64 { base modulation; description "QAM64 (64 symbols Quadrature Amplitude Modulation)"; }
identity DP-QAM64 { base modulation; description "DP-QAM64 (64 symbols Dual Polarization Quadrature Amplitude Modulation)"; }
sergiobelotti
commented
2 years ago @ggalimba56 @egriseri : do you know if a standard reference exists to be added in the description?
The identity modulation is covering almost all modulation formats.
My proposal is to complete the list adding:
Further description will be provided to the above list.