Closed ggalimba56 closed 2 years ago
2022-05-19 Daniel, Dieter, Gabriele, Jorge, Julien, Italo, Sergio
Need to clarify that this grouping is used to define a portion of the spectrum (e.g., a band) that does not match a frequency slot width (i.e., not using the n and m attributes).
OLD
description
"The parameters that define a frequency range.";
NEW
description
"This grouping defines the lower and upper bounds of a frequency range (e.g., a band).
This grouping SHOULD not be used to define a frequency slot which SHOULD be defined
using the n and m values instead.";
I would also add reference "RFC7698: GMPLS Flexi-Grid Framework";
that contains the definition of Frequency Slot based on nominal central frequency and slot width (and then n,m parameters)
Call on 05/24/22: we all agree to go for the modification proposed. AP: @sergiobelotti @italobusi : to modify the description during next PR with the description proposed above at https://github.com/ietf-ccamp-wg/ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-ext/issues/46#issuecomment-1131636870
If the below definition is referred to the portin od spectrum assigned to a Media Channel (or OTSi)
instead of using the frequency range as high - low frequency, I'd prefer tu use "m" * slot granularity In addition there is not the Media channel definition that is a topic part of L0 (in ROADMs)
Clarify in DT and fix