ietf-ccamp-wg / ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-ext-RFC9093-bis

CCAMP WG repository for ietf-layer0-types-ext
3 stars 3 forks source link

[IANA #1234168] Early review: draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis (IETF 114) #58

Closed italobusi closed 1 year ago

italobusi commented 2 years ago

Dear Authors,

Before the IETF meeting, we check documents listed on working group agendas for IANA-related issues. We have a couple of notes about this document:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ccamp-rfc9093-bis

If this bis document had a longer set of IANA Considerations, we might have different advice, but in this case, we would recommend updating the section to read as follows:

For the following URI in the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688], IANA has updated the reference field to refer to this document:

  URI:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-layer0-types
  Registrant Contact:  The IESG
  XML:  N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.

This document also adds an updated YANG module to the "YANG Module Names" registry [RFC7950]:

  Name:  ietf-layer0-types
  Namespace:  urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-layer0-types
  Prefix:  l0-types
  Reference:  this document

When a document is obsoleted, the action for us is usually to update the original registration's reference field (unless the registration is being deprecated/obsoleted). The YANG Module Names registry is unusual in that we'll actually leave the current registration alone and instead make a second registration that links to the new version of the module and has the new document as its reference.

If you have any questions, just let us know. If you'd like to talk in person, you can find us next to the RFC Editor's table from Monday through Thursday.

If at any time you'd like an early review for any document, just send us a message at iana@iana.org.

Best regards,

Amanda Baber IANA Operations Manager

italobusi commented 2 years ago

I think Amanda is right and we should update the IANA sections as she suggests