Closed italobusi closed 1 year ago
The references to RFC8776 should be updated with a reference to RFC8776-bis (i.e., [I-D.ietf-teas-rfc8776-update]) at least when there is a dependency on the updates to RFC8776 provided in RFC8776-bis
See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/1XFx6vOG-A0iCkuv5DzVVft63o0/
The references to RFC8776 should be updated with a reference to RFC8776-bis (i.e., [I-D.ietf-teas-rfc8776-update]) at least when there is a dependency on the updates to RFC8776 provided in RFC8776-bis
See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/teas/1XFx6vOG-A0iCkuv5DzVVft63o0/