Closed italobusi closed 10 months ago
Moreover:
It is proposed to keep the interoperability description in the I-D text and to focus the YANG description on how to format the string:
typedef operational-mode {
type string;
description
"Identifies an organization (e.g., vendor) specific mode.
The format of this string has to be defined by the
organization which is responsible for defining the
corresponding optical interface specification.";
}
typedef standard-mode {
type string;
description
"Identifies an ITU-T G.698.2 standard application code.
It MUST be a string with a format that follows the nomenclature defined in section 5.3 of ITU-T G.698.2.";
reference "ITU-T G.698.2 (11/2018)";
}
The description of the operational-mode is not aligned with https://github.com/ietf-ccamp-wg/draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang/issues/43:
https://github.com/ietf-ccamp-wg/ietf-ccamp-layer0-types-ext/blob/46433aa5279ccd559c17b7c6bea6c44547a99282/ietf-layer0-types-ext.yang#L162-L180