search

ietf-rats-wg / architecture

RATS Architecture
Other
16 stars 10 forks source link

RD AD review --- freshness too detailed #364

Closed mcr closed 2 years ago

mcr commented 2 years ago

* Section 10. I found the level of detail on this section on freshness out of place and inconsistent with the level of abstraction found in the rest of the test. In most other section, generic interaction of roles, artifacts, their associated topologies, and high level security properties was noted. This section delves into specific implementation choices. In particular, Is the WG sure that it needs all of the details of Section 10.3. Even among all of the Section in 10., this stands out. It doesn't seem to provide enough detail to be create interoperability but goes beyond simply introducing the concept. Section 12.3

nedmsmith commented 2 years ago

I agree with the observation, but don't believe it requires any changes.

henkbirkholz commented 2 years ago

This was carefully discussed and weighed over the entire editorial WG phase, actually. We found delicate consensus that might have also resulted in an unusual high level of attention to detail, but that detailed is most certainly warranted here especially. I think the text reflects the WG consensus building in an appropriately nuanced fashion today and am very hesitant with trying to refactor it again (even if it suddenly spikes to a maybe surprising level of detail) as I deem it unlikely that it will improve by that, tbh.

mcr commented 2 years ago

"This section is intended for those creating protocols or solutions to understand the options available to ensure freshness"