Open mcr opened 2 years ago
> My concern is that this text begs questions such as
Eric Voit says:
I believe there is value in Section 16 remaining in the architecture
document. An example of this comes from draft-ietf-rats-ar4si where Section
2.4 says:
"All freshness mechanisms of [I-D.ietf-rats-architecture], Section 10 are
supportable by this specification." As I-D.ietf-rats-architecture Section
16 provides examples of how to accomplish what is highlighted in Section 10,
it helps ar4si readers understand the possibilities. (Note that all three
of the Section 16 examples are valid embodiments of draft-ietf-rats-ar4si
Section 3.2 which detail a "Below Zero Trust" state machine.)
- Why isn't an Epoch ID Distributor depicted any role or architecture diagram?
The Epoch ID distributor is just an example of other entities that might also participate. It could go into the diagram, but it would just make the diagram busy. It could go into the prose to explain more items, but maybe we don't even need to do that. We also don't show any certification authorities.
The DAA draft introduces a role that manages anonymous groups that isn't in the arch draft.