search

ietf-rats-wg / draft-ietf-rats-corim

Other
6 stars 7 forks source link

Does the CoRIM Profile type should be identical to EAT profile type? #90

Open yogeshbdeshpande opened 1 year ago

yogeshbdeshpande commented 1 year ago

Issue is inherited from the parent Issue #77 : where profile extensibility is discussed.

However the profile type choice for CoRIM differs from EAT Profile Type though the intent of the profile is the same!

Should we consider harmonization of EAT profile type and CoRIM profile type?

nedmsmith commented 1 year ago

CoRIM can handle an EAT profile type now that #77 is resolved. It would be helpful if EAT profile could support a CoRIM profile type too. But this seems like an issue with EAT rather than CoRIM. Should this issue be "won't fix"?

deeglaze commented 1 month ago

I vote close. I think we've decided this belongs to the evidence -> internal representation transformation specification, which is separate from the CoRIM profile for values that can match the internal representation.