ietf-rats-wg / draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models

Referenceable Interaction Models for use in RATS
Other
2 stars 4 forks source link

A few definitions are missing for Challenge/Response Remote Attestation #20

Closed henkbirkholz closed 3 years ago

henkbirkholz commented 3 years ago

Based on https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/okJriJPpapmZgeOfjbVGVP57bQk/

In the sequence diagram, some elements in the bracket are not defined in the “Information Elements” section, such as targetEnvironment, collectedClaims, eventLog. Should these elements be defined?

eckelmeckel commented 3 years ago

I totally agree. These elements should either be put into Information elements (preferred), or at least be mentioned in the text.