search

ietf-rats-wg / eat

Entity Attestation Token IETF Draft Standard
Other
18 stars 15 forks source link

Security AD review: clarify intuse claim #379

Closed gmandyam closed 1 year ago

gmandyam commented 1 year ago

Reference: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rats/50ZbUkhSrU1cgOLYkir3f1kKFiY/ EAT reference: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-rats-eat-19.html#name-intuse-intended-use-claim

"** Section 4.3.3. intuse. Does the WG expect this claim to be extended with additional values? Should it be maintained with an IANA registry?"

gmandyam commented 1 year ago

Extensibility should be clarified for this claim. It seems that there could be desirable extensions that can be registered assuming they have been vetted through expert review.