(This is just a suggestion that I leave to the discretion of the editors.)
There's an opportunity to shorten the Constrained Device Standard Profile
identifier using RFC2648 URNs, i.e., using urn:ietf:rfc:XXXX rather than https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.
This would remove 21 bytes from the wire per token, which is in line with the "constrained device" scope we are trying to cover here.
laurencelundblade
commented
11 months ago
(This is just a suggestion that I leave to the discretion of the editors.)
There's an opportunity to shorten the Constrained Device Standard Profile identifier using RFC2648 URNs, i.e., using
urn:ietf:rfc:XXXXrather thanhttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfcXXXX.This would remove 21 bytes from the wire per token, which is in line with the "constrained device" scope we are trying to cover here.