identity log-type {
description
"The type of logs available.";
}
identity bios {
base log-type;
description
"Measurement log created by the BIOS/UEFI.";
}
identity ima {
base log-type;
description
"Measurement log created by IMA.";
}
Here defines log type: BIOS and IMA. I notice that BIOS log format follows TCG PC Client Spec. While network equipment boot log is different from PC client, should we add a new log type for network equipment as follows?
identity log-type {
description
"The type of logs available.";
}
identity bios {
base log-type;
description
"Measurement log created by the BIOS/UEFI.";
}
identity ima {
base log-type;
description
"Measurement log created by IMA.";
}
identity boot {
base log-type;
description
"Measurement boot log created by BIOS, os, software and patch.";
}
identity log-type { description "The type of logs available."; }
identity bios { base log-type; description "Measurement log created by the BIOS/UEFI."; }
identity ima { base log-type; description "Measurement log created by IMA."; }
Here defines log type: BIOS and IMA. I notice that BIOS log format follows TCG PC Client Spec. While network equipment boot log is different from PC client, should we add a new log type for network equipment as follows?
identity log-type { description "The type of logs available.";
} identity bios { base log-type; description "Measurement log created by the BIOS/UEFI."; } identity ima { base log-type; description "Measurement log created by IMA."; } identity boot { base log-type; description "Measurement boot log created by BIOS, os, software and patch."; }