have `one-or-more<COSE_Key>` instead of `COSE_KeySet` ? - Githubissues

ietf-rats / ietf-corim-cddl

This repository is abandoned. The adopted I-D can be found at:

https://github.com/ietf-rats-wg/draft-ietf-rats-corim/

2 stars 0 forks source link

have `one-or-more<COSE_Key>` instead of `COSE_KeySet` ? #48

Closed thomas-fossati closed 3 years ago

thomas-fossati commented 3 years ago

as per $title -- seems more coherent with the rest.

No strong opinions though.

nedmsmith commented 3 years ago

That would allow me to simplify the tables in Endorsement spec – could just declare it “+” of COSE_Key

From: Thomas Fossati @.> Reply-To: ietf-rats/ietf-corim-cddl @.> Date: Thursday, April 29, 2021 at 7:57 AM To: ietf-rats/ietf-corim-cddl @.> Cc: Subscribed @.> Subject: [ietf-rats/ietf-corim-cddl] have one-or-more<COSE_Key> instead of COSE_KeySet ? (#48)

as per $title -- seems more coherent with the rest.

No strong opinions though.

— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/ietf-rats/ietf-corim-cddl/issues/48, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABPMCSBU7XDMMWAPSWQ2LY3TLFQSNANCNFSM43Z6TANQ.