to most IETF'lers the "registry" in "Transparency Registry" will probably read counter-intuitive (violation of POLA). As I also do not know a better word, we probably have to introduce our use of "registry" a little bit better instead, I think
The first occurrence of "The WG will develop standards" needs a little bit more flesh to the bones, I think. Right now, this could mean a lot of things, such as protocols, or trust relationships, or security flows.
and a few more typos