Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 3 years ago
@rjsparks@nostrum.com _changed status from new
to under_review
_
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented
What were the other values in the header? There are places where combinations of values are checked and some combinations disallowed. You may be getting a too cryptic error because of that.
An example xml that demonstrates the issue you are experiencing would help.
@paul.hoffman@icann.org commented
I think the following is an example, but cannot tell because I'm not trying to update it right now:
@cabo@tzi.org changed title from Cannot upload XML with valid setting for rfc:consensus
to (OBE?) Cannot upload XML with valid setting for rfc:consensus
@cabo@tzi.org commented
This was when the submission interface was still trying to enforce v2 limitations; now very likely OBE.
@cabo@tzi.org commented
(FYI: v2.rnc had:
attribute consensus { "no" | "yes" }?,
)
@rjsparks@nostrum.com _changed status from under_review
to closed
_
@rjsparks@nostrum.com set resolution to overtaken by events
@rjsparks@nostrum.com commented
Agreed - nothing for us to further track/explore here.
resolution_overtaken by events
type_defect
| by paul.hoffman@icann.orgWhen submitting a draft, attempting to upload XML that is generated by kramdown gets:
draft-something-something.xml: Line 13: Value "true" for attribute consensus of rfc is not among the enumerated set
"true" is a valid value for the rfc:consensus attribute.
Issue migrated from trac:3268 at 2022-03-04 08:38:57 +0000