Open emanjon opened 1 year ago
mail could (should) also go to the AD of the Area of the closed working group (or the secretariat) as a fallback - but it would need to be very clear that it is sent because the request is to add a replaces relationship to a doc adopted by a closed group.
Describe the issue
Hi,
I had a draft adopted by LWIG (not active). The draft was then adopted by IOTOPS. When submitting the -00 IOTOPS version and marking that it replaces the LWIG draft, mails were only send to the LWIG chairs (which are not active anymore).
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-iotops-security-protocol-comparison/ https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lwig-security-protocol-comparison/
After some days I had to cancel the submission and submit without replaces. (The IOTOPS chairs fixed that later).
I suggest to change so that the mail goes to both WGs, alternatively to only the new WG.
Code of Conduct