Open Susko3 opened 1 year ago
Sorting by rfc number has the occasional anomaly, but is usually close enough, e.g.:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Carsten%20Bormann Rfc9254
This may be hacky, but is there a reason we cannot make the pubdate representation in the view match others and be Y-m-d
instead of b Y
so it sorts correctly? All the other dates are formatted that way in the template from a casual skim. So, on that note:
In any event, thanks for the great tools. I am new to IETF and they make me love engaging and contributing on the standards, I thought it may be time to give back in a small way. :-)
Thanks for the PR at #6851 - Adding a pointer here so others can follow the discussion there.
Describe the issue
Currently, sorting published RFCs by the
Date
field in profile pages (those starting with https://datatracker.ietf.org/person) will sort the dates in non-chronological order -- alphabetically by month name. I would expect the dates to be sorted in usual, chronological order: by year, month and day.The workaround is to sort by the RFC number as that has the same effect as sorting by date.
Example: https://datatracker.ietf.org/person/Robert%20T.%20Braden
Code of Conduct