Open strogonoff opened 2 years ago
These are W3C bibliographic data as provided by IETF. These document identifiers are indeed assigned by IETF, not by W3C. Maybe this should be considered correct?
Whether acceptable or not depends on semantics of docid.type
, which are still unclear to me.
According to Ronald’s comment on #5,
The publisher is not IETF.
In this case, W3C documents’
docid.type
is IETF, but it probably this should be W3C. Even thoughdocid.type
does not reflect publisher but schema/namespace, it still seems inappropriate to use IETF.https://github.com/ietf-ribose/relaton-data-misc/blob/2540405759186e98c902248a58c15e9c49b64b37/data/reference.W3C.CR-rdf-schema.yaml#L14-L19