Open paulehoffman opened 1 year ago
This is because of the lack of seriesinfo
element [1] under the rfc -> front
.
But text output doesn't seem to care about this attribute add Internet-Draft
to the header.
So this might be a possible bug in text output.
It seems like a bug in the output, and seriesInfo is not yet required. That needs to be fixed in RFCXML 3.1.
Yes, this is clearly a bug.
Describe the issue
Some drafts don't have "Internet-Draft:" in their header block. For example, see https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-bray-unichars-06.html; https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-dnsop-rfc8109bis-00.html has it correctly.
Code of Conduct