Closed dthaler closed 2 months ago
Text is ok as is
Per IETF 119 discussion:
List discussion at: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/2JwWQwFdOeMGv0VTbD0CKWwAOEA/
Proposed change posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bpf/f3Hyx3QnAlgTMaIhr9SRMTL83zA/
Fixed in draft-02
The "code pointer" inst.imm is actually an instruction offset to code in the BPF program, not an actual memory pointer like "data pointer" is.
A use case is the callback argument to the
bpf_loop()
helper function.