ietf-wg-ccwg / rfc5033bis

IETF drafts
Other
4 stars 6 forks source link

add requirement to not ignore high losses. #106

Closed huitema closed 6 months ago

huitema commented 6 months ago

This is an attempt to address issue #101

nealcardwell commented 6 months ago

Current version looks good to me as well, FWIW.

nealcardwell commented 6 months ago

Thanks! Looks good to me, FWIW. :-)