These proposed changes are intended to ready this for publication:
They seek to fix some inconsistencies.
They seek to improve reading, by explicitly saying what was intended.
They seek to elevate three /should/SHOULD/, because I suggest these topics will indeed be needed in any transport review of a CC algo.
They change /Cubic/CUBIC/ because that is how it is defined in the related RFC, and define FQ.
I would really like to change this, so I propose: /one might still need to share/can still need to share/ in the IoT section, - not because it changes what is needed, but it might avoid being misrepresented in future.
I updated the revision notes and removed me as an Acknowledgment, since I'm an editor ack'ing myself.
These proposed changes are intended to ready this for publication: