PR to fix issues after WGLC (MW)

ietf-wg-ccwg / rfc5033bis

IETF drafts

Other

4 stars 6 forks source link

PR to fix issues after WGLC (MW) #93

Closed gorryfair closed 7 months ago

gorryfair commented 7 months ago

Do not merge yet!

gorryfair commented 7 months ago

Michael originated the PR (via email), so "yes". He may have more comments, but I do not know of any.

renghardt commented 7 months ago

Michael originated the PR (via email), so "yes". He may have more comments, but I do not know of any.

Ah. Going back to Michael's email titled "Review of RFC5033bis" sent on 23. Feb, I see comments on whether to mention DCCP, a suggestion to link to a different reference for Bufferbloat, and a bit about Section 5 having potentially colliding MUSTs and MAYs. I didn't see any discussion of these comments, so that's why I asked.