search

ietf-wg-deleg / draft-ietf-deleg-requirements

Other
0 stars 2 forks source link

Not naming the WG in the draft #4

Closed paulehoffman closed 1 month ago

paulehoffman commented 1 month ago

The draft says "However, the working group should strive to test any proposed mechanism against a wide range of legacy software and come to a consensus as to what constitutes adherence to this requirement." That's not appropriate wording for the eventual RFC, even as as soft requirement. This would be better as some wording before the beginning of 3.1, and not put it on the WG but instead on the community.

moonshiner commented 1 month ago

this makes sense. we will wordsmith something

moonshiner commented 1 month ago

I replaced "working group" with "DNS community" for now