search

ietf-wg-dmarc / dmarc-draftissues

1 stars 0 forks source link

Nit: misplaced SHOULD in section 7.2 #103

Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 3 years ago

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

owner:alex_brotman@comcast.com resolution_fixed type_defect | by mike@mtcc.com

The sentence:

" The report SHOULD include the following data:"

should just drop the normative SHOULD here since what follows is not normative, it's informational. I don't understand what motivated the SHOULD level language either. If it remains, it should be a MUST IMO.

Issue migrated from trac:103 at 2022-01-24 16:53:23 +0000

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

_@alexbrotman@comcast.com changed status from new to assigned

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

_@alexbrotman@comcast.com _set owner to alex_brotman@comcast.com_

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

_@alexbrotman@comcast.com changed status from assigned to closed

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

_@alexbrotman@comcast.com set resolution to fixed

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

_@alexbrotman@comcast.com changed component from dmarc-bis to dmarc-aggregate-reporting