Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 4 years ago
@seth@sethblank.com changed status from new
to assigned
@seth@sethblank.com removed owner (was draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis@ietf.org
)
@seth@sethblank.com changed component from rfc7601bis
to dmarc-bis
@tjw.ietf@gmail.com commented
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dmarc/?gbt=1&index=ubbMv1HrhxG6SeNbs8UdxE_abw0
@seth@sethblank.com commented
The consensus of the working group is that this is valid, and discouraging such usage should be left to a BCP or guidance document.
@seth@sethblank.com changed status from assigned
to closed
@seth@sethblank.com set resolution to fixed
keyword_nit_tag-update
resolution_fixed
type_defect
| by seth@sethblank.comp=none without reporting is the same as having no record, but many organizations do just this and expect a benefit. Explicitly making this case invalid would remove confusion from the ecosystem.
In particular, there are a huge number of domains in Europe that have been putting in bare "p=none" records and claiming to have DMARC in place.
Issue migrated from trac:63 at 2022-01-24 16:17:42 +0000