ietf-wg-dmarc / draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting

3 stars 4 forks source link

XML format: version #12

Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 1 year ago

ietf-svn-bot commented 4 years ago

type_enhancement | by vesely@tana.it


Note added in ​http://bit.ly/dmarc-rpt-schema

It is more useful to specify the XML format version using the URI of a spec file, such as http://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.2. Therefore, it is reduntand, useless , and error prone to have a element, which currently stands right at the beginning of the element.

There are several tools that can validate XML syntax based on a specification. To allow automated syntax verification, reports should refer to the schema version in the feedback element namespace, for example, like so:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
   <dmarc:feedback
         xmlns:xs="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
         xmlns:dmarc="http://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.2">
      <report_metadata>
         <org_name>example.com</org_name>
[...]

Issue migrated from trac:33 at 2022-01-24 16:15:35 +0000

ietf-svn-bot commented 4 years ago

@freddie@freddieleeman.nl commented


I agree.

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@todd.herr@valimail.com changed component from dmarc-future-notes to dmarc-aggregate-reporting

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

_@alexbrotman@comcast.com commented


Was this supposed to point here? https://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.1/rua.xsd

abrotman commented 1 year ago

I believe this to be resolved after Ale's contributions.