Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 1 year ago
@freddie@freddieleeman.nl commented
I agree.
@todd.herr@valimail.com changed component from dmarc-future-notes
to dmarc-aggregate-reporting
_@alexbrotman@comcast.com commented
Was this supposed to point here? https://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.1/rua.xsd
I believe this to be resolved after Ale's contributions.
type_enhancement
| by vesely@tana.itNote added in http://bit.ly/dmarc-rpt-schema
It is more useful to specify the XML format version using the URI of a spec file, such as http://dmarc.org/dmarc-xml/0.2. Therefore, it is reduntand, useless , and error prone to have a element, which currently stands right at the beginning of the element.
There are several tools that can validate XML syntax based on a specification. To allow automated syntax verification, reports should refer to the schema version in the feedback element namespace, for example, like so:
Issue migrated from trac:33 at 2022-01-24 16:15:35 +0000