search

ietf-wg-dmarc / draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis

7 stars 4 forks source link

What to say about "p=reject"? #115

Closed toddherr closed 8 months ago

toddherr commented 1 year ago

Ticket to track long-running discussion, both on-list and off, regarding what the text should say about the implications and advisability of a sending domain publishing a p=reject policy and a receiving domain acting on that.

Revision 28 of DMARCbis (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis/) contains the latest attempt at text designed to gain rough consensus, with a section titled "Interoperability Considerations" (section 8.6), although it is understood that there is still some polishing to be done on that and related sections.

toddherr commented 8 months ago

Text exists in the Interoperability Considerations section to address this as of rev -29. This text seemed to satisfy rough consensus of the working group, and therefore I recommend closing this issue.

toddherr commented 8 months ago

Chair concurs with closing ticket. Last call initiated.