search

ietf-wg-dmarc / draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis

5 stars 4 forks source link

Some Spelling Nits #125

Closed moonshiner closed 6 months ago

moonshiner commented 6 months ago

5.5.2

messages sent to such users will always produce DMARC fail.

always produce DMARC failure ?

5.8

However, such deviation is not proscribed.

While proscribed is correct, perhaps something like allowed be more obvious to non-English speakers?

8.6 without further anaysis is that rejecting messages that have been

s/anaysis/analysis/

subscriptions to that mailing list cancelled by the list software's

s/cancelled/canceled/

10.1

organizational PSDs that do not mandate DMARC use by registants risk

s/registants/registrants/

toddherr commented 6 months ago

5.5.2 changed to 'DMARC result of "fail"' in keeping with other uses of that phrasing in the document.

5.8 changed 'proscribed' to 'forbidden'.

8.6 changed to 'analysis' and 'canceled', respectively.

10.1 changed to 'registrants'

toddherr commented 6 months ago

Changes incorporated into rev -31 branch.

Closing issue.