Closed toddherr closed 2 months ago
First rev of errata discussion pushed to working branch.
Only errata addressed were the eight errata from 7489 in either Verified or Held for Document Update state.
There are eight more in the Reported state, but https://www.rfc-editor.org/styleguide/part2/#ref_errata seems to indicate that these can be ignored.
Confirmed that only Verified or Held for Document Update status errata need to be addressed.
All errata addressed in DMARCbis.
Add text to section 7, Changes from RFC 7489, that discusses which errata from https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7489 have been addressed in DMARCbis.