search

ietf-wg-dmarc / draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis

7 stars 4 forks source link

Reporting URIs #89

Closed ietf-svn-bot closed 2 years ago

ietf-svn-bot commented 5 years ago

owner:todd.herr@valimail.com type_task | by tim@eudaemon.net

Section 6.3 says that ruf and rua tags can take any URI, but only define the meaning of a mailto: URI. Either it should define some other URI schemes or it should say that only mailto: URIs are valid.

Back in the olden days there was an http or https scheme that we took out because it was ill specified, and nobody but me had tried to implement it. If people are interested in an https PUT scheme it would be easy enough to define one, but only if someone says they want to use it. For large reports it could be somewhat faster than mailto both because the report body isn't base64 encoded and the report goes straight to the https server and doesn't get relayed as mail does.

Issue migrated from trac:29 at 2022-01-24 16:15:20 +0000

ietf-svn-bot commented 5 years ago

@tim@eudaemon.net commented

List traffic mentions newish working http POST scheme for TLSRPT.

ietf-svn-bot commented 5 years ago

@johnl@taugh.com commented

Specifying a POST or PUT of an XML blob is easy, question is whether there is enough interest to be worth doing so. Semantically PUT is correct, if you PUT the same file twice it's idempotent, but POST is more familiar.

ietf-svn-bot commented 4 years ago

@freddie@freddieleeman.nl commented

I do not think an MTA should do HTTP traffic, most of them might not even be allowed to due to firewall rules. If this is something that remains in the DMARC spec it should be a POST, not a PUT. But my vote will be against this form of report delivery.

Also rua=mailto: (path-empty) is considered to be valid according to the [URI] ABNF. But since this is NOT a valid DMARC report endpoint I think we need to adjust the [DMARC] ABNF accordingly.

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@todd.herr@valimail.com changed component from dmarc-future-notes to dmarc-bis

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@todd.herr@valimail.com commented

As reported in ticket ietf-wg-dmarc/draft-ietf-dmarc-dmarcbis#86:

Long thread on mailing list is here - https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/DvMTzIy_u6HeK2ptGX9x1oy74kQ/

Thread seemed to fizzle out with takeaways being:

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@todd.herr@valimail.com changed status from new to assigned

ietf-svn-bot commented 3 years ago

@todd.herr@valimail.com set owner to todd.herr@valimail.com

toddherr commented 2 years ago

No real interest in URIs other than mailto, so closing ticket.