Open ietf-svn-bot opened 5 years ago
@tim@eudaemon.net commented
This might be a candidate for the DMARC Usage Guide. People also talking about DMARC Deployment Guide, which right now may/may-not be the same thing.
@seth@sethblank.com set owner to draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis@ietf.org
@seth@sethblank.com changed component from dmarc-future-notes
to rfc7601bis
@seth@sethblank.com commented
See: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/TPUpxEFCM39JyPLWmL49mY4cFS8/
@vesely@tana.it changed status from new
to closed
@vesely@tana.it set resolution to wontfix
@vesely@tana.it commented
Discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/W3uGPEpT3Yi5lqKntZXyL8jkNjk
@vesely@tana.it changed status from closed
to new
@vesely@tana.it removed resolution (was wontfix
)
@vesely@tana.it commented
Further discussion: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dmarc/iFJWghWV1eSNkaWfmeguO9aRzjw
@todd.herr@valimail.com changed component from rfc7601bis
to dmarc-failure-reporting
owner:draft-ietf-dmarc-rfc7601bis@ietf.org
type_enhancement
| by tim@eudaemon.netApropos recent discussions, we could recommend that failure reports be rate limited per recipient both to break loops and to deter indirect mail bombing.
Issue migrated from trac:28 at 2022-01-24 16:15:15 +0000